Many people who think of themselves as scientists like to call astrology a “pseudoscience.” Pseudoscience is defined as “a collection of beliefs or practices mistakenly regarded as being based on scientific method” but some writers go so far as to call some of these fields of study “fake sciences,” meaning they purport to be science but are not. These theorists claim that because astrology is scientifically incorrect (planets don’t move backward and the Sun doesn’t orbit the earth) it is a fake science.
From what I can remember from high school science, the scientific method involves a series of testing with predictable results that are the same in every test. I don’t think anyone can argue that astrology, in any form, can be thought of as passing scientific muster.
The practice of astrology has no rules, and there are countless branches and techniques that are completely different from each other. Two exact natal charts can result in two totally different human beings who make different choices and have very different lives, and two individuals undergoing the exact same planetary transits will have unpredictable experiences. However, this does not negate the fact that an astrological reading of a natal chart from a skilled astrology can be an accurate representation of the various factors of the human personality.
Recently an article has been circulating about the political groups who most believe that astrology is scientific. As with most such debunking articles, this one is based on who reads newspaper “horoscopes.” I think most people understand that newspaper horoscopes are not astrology, so the entire premise of this study is flawed from the beginning.
Still, the study shows that more and more people believe in astrology which I think is encouraging and likely […]